Publication ethics

  1. Principles of Publication Ethics for Members of the Editorial Board

 

Members of the editorial board of the journal «Bulletin KazNU. Series Mathematics, Mechanics, Informatics» are responsible for the development, improvement of the journal, for the promotion of the journal in international databases, must follow the principles of freedom of opinion, meet the scientific and professional needs of the authors and readers of the journal, do not allow the commercial interests of the author, reviewer and publisher of the journal to influence making decisions on the publication of materials should also take all possible measures to improve the quality of scientific publications, to protect the confidentiality of information data at all stages of the publication process.

Equality about all authors. Members of the district The editors onnoy board responsible for deciding on the publication in the journal Representation as claimed by the authors of materials. Editorial board members should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, nationality, political views of the authors, or commercial considerations.

Deciding on publication and manuscript. The decision about which of the articles Representation as claimed in edition to be published, accepted the editorship of the magazine, based on test results for compliance with the registration requirements of plagiarism and the results of the scientific peer review. When deciding on the publication of the manuscript editorial board of the journal is guided by the politics and ethics of publication, does not allow for the publication of articles Lu with evidence of plagiarism , violation of the principles, standards and norms of scientific ethics and copyright infringement.

Members of the editorial board are responsible for the publication of articles with deliberately known signs of unethical behavior, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, excessive self-citation by authors, and conflicts of interest. In the case when writing the article the principles have been violated by the Publication and / or scientific ethics, magazine based on the decision of the editorial board  hold retraction publication . Articles can be with draw by the author (s) or the editors of the journal. The editorial board carries out the withdrawal (retraction) of published articles in case of violation of publication and / or scientific ethics, based on the recommendations of COPE. An article is withdrawn / withdrawn (retracted) in the event of:

- if there is clear evidence that the data are unreliable or obtained as a result of misconduct , such as umbilical cord data; 

- discovery of the fact of publication of the manuscript in another edition and before its publication in the journal «Bulletin KazNU. Series of mathematics, mechanics, computer science»; 

- detected s plagiarism and in the article, including the detected borrowing figures, graphs, tables , etc. 

- the presence in the article of gross errors that can negatively affect other scientists and their research, for example , a miscalculation or an experimental error; 

- the appearance of claims about copyright for the article or its individual parts by third parties; 

- the availability of the article information, principles, standards and norms of publication and / or scientific ethics . 

In such cases above , the editorial board of the journal conducts a check, according to the results of which the article can be withdrawn / withdrawn (retracted) from publication. For this, an act of retraction of the article from publication is drawn up, which is confirmed and signed by the scientific editor. A copy of the act sent to the author for correspondence of the article.

After that, on the website of the journal, the article is marked as tragic, indicating the reasons. Editorial publishes information on seizures (retraction) article on the front page of the magazine and website posts information, after the removal of the procedure carried out (retractions) article, in a subsequent number of e magazine .

Editorial office of the journal «Bulletin KazNU. A series of mathematics, mechanics, informatics» responsibly , objectively and carefully considers all reasonable appeals regarding the violations found in the published issues.

The editors considered the responsibility and obligation of the author s and reviewer s as expeditiously as possible to inform the editorial board of mistakes and violations revealed by them after the publication of the material.

Confidentiality principle. At the stage of reviewing the manuscript (before its publication), editors and members of the editorial board should not share information about it with anyone other than the authors , appointed reviewers and the publisher. Any information received to the races with the discretion of the manuscript should be regarded as confidential material. Manuscripts should not be displayed or discussed with third parties without the permission of the scientific editor.

Members of the district The editors annoy board will ensure that the rejected manuscript will not be used in trials of members of the editorial board of its own e ology without the written consent of the author s .

Consider of unethical behavior. Members of the district  individually with s be every complaint of unethical behavior author and (s) of the manuscript and publish the bathrooms in the journal «Bulletin of the KazNU. Series of Mathematics, Mechanics, Informatics» articles, regardless of the time of its receipt. Members of the district and to make objective and appropriate measures in respect of such claims. In the case of confirmation of the arguments, members of the district and have the right to refuse publication of the manuscript, and to cease further cooperation with the author for correspondence , to publish a refutation, and to take other measures to further curb unethical behavior of the author (s) .

 

8.1.1 Executive Board , their duties and responsibilities

 

Duties and responsibilities of the scientific editor of the magazine and the "Bulletin of the KazNU. A series of mathematics, mechanics, computer science, " the executive secretary, the members of the editorial board are specified in the relevant statement must of instructions.

 

8.2 Principles of author publication ethics

 

One-time publication. Author (s) guarantee that the editors manuscript was not well presented and for the consideration of I in the other editions. Submission of a manuscript at a time in several of their journals / publications is unacceptable and is a gross violation of the principles, standards and norms of publication ethics .

Authorship of the manuscript . The person who made the greatest intellectual contribution to the preparation of the manuscript (with two or more co- authors ) is indicated first in the list of authors. Each article must be assigned to the author for correspondence, which is responsible for the preparation of the final version of this article, the communication with the Editorial Board, should ensure that all participants in the study (with the number of authors is more than one), have made it an adequate contribution in author, and get approval of the final version of the manuscript from all authors for submission to the editor for publication. All authors mentioned in the manuscript / article are responsible for the content of the work.

The principle of originality. Author (s) ensures that e t that results of the study outlined in the manuscript is an original work independently and do not contain incorrect borrowing and plagiarism, which can be identified in the process of checking the manuscript through to the plagiarism checking system .

The authors are responsible for the publication of articles with signs of unethical behavior, plagiarism, self- plagiarism, self-citation, falsification, fabrication, data distortion, false authorship, duplication, conflicts of interest and deception.

The principle of confirmation of sources. The author (s) undertakes to correctly indicate scientific and other sources that he (s) used (s) in the course of the research. In the case of any - or parts of other people's work and / or borrowing claims each author and in the manuscript should be indicated bibliographic references indicating the author (s) of the source. Information obtained from questionable sources should not use in the preparation of the manuscript.

In case, if the reviewers, Scientific editor and, member (s) of the editorial board of the magazine there are doubts the authenticity and validity of the research results, the author required to provide additional materials to confirm the results or facts cited in the manuscript .

Correction of errors in the publishing process. If errors and inaccuracies in the work revealed at any stage of the publication process, the authors undertake to urgently inform the scientific editor about this and provide assistance in eliminating or correcting the error for publication on the journal's website of the corresponding correction (Corrigendum) with comments. In case of detection of gross errors that are impossible to correct the author to withdraw the manuscript / article.

Publication Ethics Principle. Authors are required to comply with ethical norms related to criticism or comments in relation to research, as well as for interaction with the editors about criticizes  and publications. Failure ethical authors as gross impropriety publications and provides a basis for removing the manuscript with reviewing and / or publications.

 

8.3 Principles of Publication Ethics for the Reviewer

 

The principle of objectivity of peer review. Reviewer (s) of the journal “ Bulletin of KazNU. Series Mathematics, Mechanics and Computer Science » undertakes conduct peer review of the manuscript objectively. Personal criticism of the author (s) of the manuscript is unacceptable. The reviewer must provide an argument for his comments and justify his decision to accept the manuscript or to reject it.

The nationality, religious affiliation, political or other views of the author (s) should not be taken into account and taken into account in the process of reviewing the manuscript by the reviewer (s) .

The reviewer's treasure is for editorial decisions . Expert evaluation, compiled reviewer (s) contributes to making a decision , I edited the publication, and also helps the author (-am) Seizing w it the manuscript. The decision to accept the manuscript for publication, return the work to the author for modification or revision, or the decision to reject publication is made by the editorial board based on the results of the review.

The principle of timeliness of peer review. The reviewer is required to provide a review within the period specified edited, but not later than two months from the receipt of the manuscript for review . If the consideration of the article and preparation of the review within the prescribed timeframe is not possible, the reviewer must immediately notify the scientific editor.

A reviewer who believes that his qualifications do not correspond or are insufficient to make a decision when reviewing the submitted manuscript must immediately inform the scientific editor of this and refuse to review the manuscript.

The principle of confidentiality on the part of the reviewer. The manuscript provided to the reviewer for peer review should treated as confidential material. The reviewer has the right to demonstrate it and / or discuss it with other persons only after receiving written permission from the scientific editor of the journal and / or author (s) .

The information and ideas of scientific work obtained during the peer review and the support of the publication process not used by the reviewer for personal.

The principle of confirmation of sources. The reviewer should indicate research papers that would have influenced the research results of the manuscript in question, but will not cited by the author (s). Also the reviewer is obliged to draw the attention of the scientific editor to significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript in question and a previously published work of which he is aware.

If the reviewer has sufficient grounds to believe that the manuscript contains plagiarism, incorrect borrowing, false and fabricated materials or research results, then he should not allow the manuscript to published and inform the scientific editor of the journal about the revealed violations of the principles, standards and norms of publication and scientific ethics.

 

8.4 Conflicts of interest

 

Conflict of interest, by definition, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), this conflict situation , in Kotor 's authors, reviewers and editorial board members have implicit interests, able to affect their judgment regarding the published material. A conflict of interest arises when there are financial, personal, or professional conditions that can affect the scientific judgment of the reviewer and editorial board members, and, as a result, the editorial board's decision regarding the publication of a manuscript .

Responsibility magazine editor to require all at h and a pendulum process of publishing the manuscript disclosing conflicts that interest.

Scientific editor, editorial board member and reviewers must notify of a potential conflict of interest that can somehow influence the decision of the editorial board. Members of the district and to refuse to consider manuscripts if they state I so public - or competitive relationships, connectedness 's research results the author (s) of the manuscript , or if there is a conflict of interest.

When the hearth manuscript for review to the journal, the author (s) declares that the content of the manuscript shows all sources of funding for research; also point to Which are the commercial, financial, personal or professional factors that could create a conflict of interest in relation to the submitted manuscript. The author (s), in the cover letter, if there is a conflict of interest, may indicate scientists who, in their opinion, will not be able to objectively evaluate their manuscript.

The reviewer should not consider manuscripts that may cause a conflict of interest arising from competition, collaboration, or other relationship with any of the authors related to the manuscript.

In the event of a conflict and the interests of the contents of the manuscript, the responsible editor must notify the scientific editor, then editor of the scientific entrusts checking and reviewing e manuscript to another editor / reviewer.

The existence of a conflict of interest between teaching a pendulum during the races with no means and discretion of the review, that the manuscript will rejected.

All interested parties must be, as far as possible to avoid the occurrence of conflict and interests in any boil and for all x stages of publication. In the event of any conflict of interest, the person who discovered this conflict must immediately notify the editorial board of this. The same goes for any other breach of the first principles, standards and norms of publication and scientific ethics.